We specialize in SAE/BSP/METRIC hydraulic adapters and fittings.
A fitting that has been rated way above the pressure level of the system can break down even years before it is supposed to, but pressure ratings cannot be responsible for this. There is no hydraulic system whose pressure remains constant throughout; there are movements in the cylinders, there are movements in the valves, and there is fluctuation in the output level of the pumps according to the load applied on the system. Each of these activities produces a pressure surge in the piping.
That's what is referred to as pulse pressure fatigue, which is completely different from any overpressure blowout. This kind of failure occurs slowly, and quietly, with the effects appearing only after several months.
The pressure rating of a fitting usually depends on static or burst test ratings; it determines the amount of pressure that the fitting is capable of holding when subjected to a single-time and stationary load. Pulsating pressure is a different question entirely: it's about how many pressure cycles the fitting survives, not how high a single pressure it can withstand. The pressure rating of a fitting may exceed the maximum pressure of the whole system by far and still fail by developing a fatigue crack through repeated cycles due to the repeated loading of the fitting.
Testing done by the industry is an example that shows how industry testing is based on this distinction. For instance, standards such as ISO 10771 (cycling test of hydraulic fittings made from metallic materials in terms of fatigue pressure test), as well as SAE J343, require cycling of a fitting several times until it starts leaking or cracks, and not testing at one pressure level. In fact, this number of cycles, and not the pressure level, defines fatigue life of a fitting.
The cracks resulting from fatigue do not begin randomly anywhere on the surface of the fitting, but rather at particular geometric points of stress concentration. The location of such a point is largely determined by the geometry of the structure itself.
Thread roots the most likely point of failure is at the root of the threads. Such a geometric point is characterized by a sudden change in the shape of the structure, which results in significant stress concentrations several times higher than the actual stress present in the material.
Flare bases carry a similar risk on JIC and BSP-style connections the geometric transition where the flare meets the straight section of the fitting concentrates stress in much the same way a thread root does.
Weld toes are the equivalent weak point on welded fittings the transition zone at the edge of a weld bead, especially if residual tensile stress from the welding process hasn't been relieved.
None of this means these structure types are unreliable. It means the design and manufacturing quality around those specific points thread root radius, flare finish, weld heat treatment matters more for pulse fatigue resistance than the fitting's static pressure rating does.
A few working conditions accelerate fatigue damage well beyond what a fitting's rated cycle count would suggest on its own:
Unsupported hose or line lengths. A long run without adequate clamping flexes more under pulsation, concentrating additional stress right at the rigid fitting connection.
Corrosion pits. Even slight surface corrosion will produce a stress concentration just like a machining flaw, which gives a fatigue crack a running start that it does not deserve.
Surface finish and residual stress from manufacturing. A thread root or flare surface that is rough will have more areas for a crack to start at a microscopic level, and there is also an increase in tensile stress due to machining or welding.
Elevated temperature. Fatigue failure occurs faster due to heating regardless of pressure, which is the reason why an appropriate impulse test must be done under high temperature conditions.
Match cycle-rated performance to actual duty cycle, not just peak pressure. A continuously cycling circuit a press, a packer, a boom puts far more fatigue demand on a fitting than an occasional-use line at the same working pressure. For unusual duty cycles or non-standard connection requirements, custom hydraulic adapter fittings can be developed to suit around the actual stress points and working conditions.
Look for adequate hose support and routing around rigid fittings, as inadequate support subjects the hose to the very stresses that lead to fatigue failures.
Ask about surface finish and heat treatment, not just pressure rating, when sourcing for high-vibration or continuous-cycling applications, this is where a reliable steel hydraulic adapter fittings manufacturer with real quality control earns its price.
Is there any possibility of failure of the fitting due to pulsation even when it does not exceed the pressure limit?
Yes, the reason for pulse fatigue is not just due to pressure limit; rather it depends on the frequency of pressure cycles. A fitting which works comfortably within the pressure limit may fail due to fatigue after some cycles.
Geometry discontinuity such as the roots of threads causes stress concentrations much higher than the nominal value in the adjacent material. During cyclic loading, it is here that the cracks initiate.
Usually even more important. When vibration frequencies in a machine correspond to those of a hydraulic line, harmonic resonance will amplify stresses much more than the pressure cycle would.
Testing procedures such as those described in ISO 10771 and SAE J343 involve cycling the jointing component repeatedly until it fails, usually up to 133% of its operating pressure limit, possibly at an elevated temperature. The number of cycles before failure is the true test of fatigue resistance.
Static pressure resistance and pulse pressure resistance cannot be considered equally. It is possible that a fitting will be capable of withstanding the pressure of the system without problems while being under steady state but will undergo completely different stresses under conditions of repeated cycles, vibration and changes. Therefore, buying steel hydraulic fittings based on the static pressure rating can ignore an array of other factors that influence their service life. When choosing a fitting, buyers should take into account the true duty cycle, pressure changes, vibrations, type of seal and working conditions.
NingBo NJ Hydraulic Adapter Co., Ltd. has manufactured steel hydraulic adapters and fittings since 2004 and supplies its products to distributors and OEMs all over the world. Among NJ Adapter's offerings, there are steel hydraulic adapter fittings of different standards (SAE, BSP, Metric and DIN). The company's production and quality control procedures include a range of factors, such as thread precision, surface treatment, and structural quality.
For distributors looking for a reliable steel hydraulic adapter fittings supplier, NJ Adapter can also provide customized solutions according to working conditions. Explore the full range of products at https://www.njadapter.com/steel-adapters-fittings.html.
GlobalSpec, "ISO 10771-1: Fatigue Pressure Testing of Metal Pressure-Containing Envelopes"
— https://standards.globalspec.com/std/9938011/iso-10771-1
Kingdaflex, "Hydraulic Hose Impulse Rating Explained: What OEMs Need To Know" — https://kingdaflex.com/hydraulic-hose-impulse-rating-explained/
Blackrock Engineering, "Fatigue Failure: Crack Initiation and Propagation" —
https://www.blackrock-engineering.ca/blog/fatigue-failure-crack-initiation-and-propagation/
CNTOPA, "Why Do Hydraulic Fittings Fail Before Their Expected Life?" —
https://cntopa.com/why-do-hydraulic-fittings-fail-before-their-expected-life.html
CNTOPA, "Hydraulic Fitting Vibration Fatigue: Anti-Vibration Design" —
https://cntopa.com/hydraulic-fitting-vibration-fatigue-analysis-anti-vibration-design.html